PDA

View Full Version : on batman begins (possible spoilers involved?)


robot
06-23-2005, 11:25 AM
psychotropic substances in biological warfare?

oh the possibilities

music
06-23-2005, 12:36 PM
It was bad. Really bad. It didnt have clayface. Plus, they ruined Scarecrow who was mediocre.

Linzoy
06-23-2005, 01:31 PM
I thought it was awesome. It doesn't have to be exactly like the comics, which I haven't read so I don't know what I'm talking about.

This is going to be a good year for movies. All the summer movies actually look like good movies.

587
07-04-2005, 12:12 AM
I really liked it.

Shaman King
07-04-2005, 10:42 AM
Ok, back on topic...

it would be less effective and more expensive than just shooting the enemy with a gun. The idea is nifty, but confined to movies.

Davey Rootbeer
07-04-2005, 03:13 PM
In other news, Gotham == Midgar?


What the hell, people? Upper rich, lower slums, a huge (single) business that controls everything, Corruption++, a train system that wraps around it all...

The only thing they're missing is a guy in a long black cape, who dispirses "vigilante justice".

..wait. nevermind. they got that, too.

Shadowfox
07-04-2005, 05:54 PM
I don't understand why they didn't just disperse a gas that would kill everyone. Much simpler.

Young Jeff Bridges
07-04-2005, 10:58 PM
i loved it and cannot wait for the sequel. christian bale roxxx the house as batman and bruce wayne. christopher nolan better come back for the second one. JOKER & MORE SCARECROW? im there.

steffi
07-04-2005, 11:07 PM
WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU CHRISTIAN BALE SUCKS

but I really liked this movie.

the minimoose fan
07-05-2005, 05:19 AM
i loved it and cannot wait for the sequel. christian bale roxxx the house as batman and bruce wayne. christopher nolan better come back for the second one. JOKER & MORE SCARECROW? im there.
Actually the movie Batman is about the Joker. You should rent it sometime.

Shaman King
07-05-2005, 10:13 AM
Actually the movie Batman is about the Joker. You should rent it sometime.
It's not the same timeline. This one supposedly messed with the timeline and stuff, causing my whiny fanboy acquantaince to bitch about it. A lot. A sequel to this, directed by Nolan, would be sweet.

In other news, Gotham == Midgar?


What the hell, people? Upper rich, lower slums, a huge (single) business that controls everything, Corruption++, a train system that wraps around it all...

The only thing they're missing is a guy in a long black cape, who dispirses "vigilante justice".

..wait. nevermind. they got that, too.

If only the scarecrow said "Gya ha ha"

Linzoy
07-05-2005, 11:31 AM
I don't understand why they didn't just disperse a gas that would kill everyone. Much simpler.Living people would take their place and they would tighten security so it won't happen again. They wanted the city destroyed, not the people.

Young Jeff Bridges
07-05-2005, 12:50 PM
tim burton's BATMAN doesn't count as canon, and these new batman films have nothing to do with the previous four. because wb realised they sucked pretty much.

Shadowfox
07-05-2005, 03:26 PM
Living people would take their place and they would tighten security so it won't happen again. They wanted the city destroyed, not the people.

Meh. I can't see people racing to live in a city that was just converted into a massive graveyard. Besides, if destroying the city's their goal they'd be better off just nuking it. Psychotropic substances don't affect buildings and I can't see even the legions of insane people taking out those skyscrapers.

Shaman King
07-05-2005, 07:38 PM
Oh my god <h1>they picked it because they make a nifty plot device</h1> there was no other reason

Linzoy
07-05-2005, 08:34 PM
Now my entire perception of reality is altered.

Shadowfox, middle class americans might not want to be there, but there are always many many desperate poor people of the world who are willing to do a lot of work. The buildings would still be fit to live in, but the prices would go down because it would be considered dangerous. The city would fill up pretty quickly with lots of people who are willing to do a lot of work and take risks, and those kind of people would probably run the city more strongly than the people who where killed.

Shadowfox
07-05-2005, 09:03 PM
See, I kind of got the impression that it was the desperate poor people who were <i>already</i> living there.

Oh my god <h1>they picked it because they make a nifty plot device</h1> there was no other reason

Yeah, I know. I just like it better when they disguise that.

Linzoy
07-06-2005, 09:13 AM
It's not possible for all the poor people in the world to live in one city.

Shadowfox
07-06-2005, 09:40 AM
...yes? What does that have to do with anything?

Linzoy
07-06-2005, 10:03 AM
It has to do with what I said before about living people replacing the dead people and the city becoming harder to destroy.